SACRAMENTO RIVER
 

 

May 12, 2017    Headline
Stripers Pushing Up
 

Sacramento River/Metropolitan Area:
Dennis Phanner of Sacramento Pro Tackle reported Thursday 5-11, “The shad bite is pretty good for small males, but fishermen are limited to a few areas including Miller Park at the end of Broadway and on the west side of the river. The shad are close to the shoreline. Striper fishing is best in the north Delta sloughs of Miner, Steamboat, and the Old Sacramento River while in the Sacramento area, a few fishermen are using pile worms or blood worms off of the banks.” They have a ‘decent’ grade of frozen sardines in the shop from southern California, but the high water has kept the demand for sardines to a minimum.

Feather River:
Mike Searcy at Johnson’s Bait and Tackle in Yuba City said Wednesday 5-10, “The river will be bumped up to the 25,000 to 30,000 cfs range, and I don’t think it will affect the great striper bite as they should move out into to the middle of the river. Trollers are scoring with plugs, tossing swimbaits, drifting jumbo minnows, or casting pile worms or anchovies from the shoreline. The water releases should cool down the river, and perhaps the stripers will stick around a bit longer as they have been spawning heavily over the past week.” They have sold a load of minnows since this action started several weeks ago.  On the Sacramento River, the Tisdale Launch ramp is expected to be cleared by Friday.


Sacramento River/Metropolitan Area:
Uncle Larry Barnes of Sacramento Pro Tackle reported Thursday 5-4 that shad fishermen are congregating around Miller Park with shad darts behind a 1 to 1.5-ounce egg sinker in order to stay down near the bottom. He said, “They may be also out of Discovery Park, and we are hearing reports out of Knight’s Landing for shad. The water is high, and it is dirtier than normal at this time of year. We will be having a special on frozen sardines this Saturday and Sunday at $1.49/pound, and fishermen can purchase up to 5 pounds apiece. The sardines run 5 or 6 to a pound.”
Still loads of stripers being caught over a wide area with guides seeing 20 to 40 fish. Still lots of small barely legal to shaker males and a few larger hens to 20 pounds being caught every day. There are still more bass moving out of SF bay and with the high flows this bite will continue into possibly June.

Feather River:
J.D. Richey of Richey’s Sport Fishing is on the Feather for stripers, and he said, “We hooked a bunch of fish on Thursday 5-4 on the lower Feather on spoons. Most were either small keepers or shakers, but we did catch and release a female in the high teens. We also lost a massive striper estimated at 35 to 40 pounds when it went into the trees.”
Mike Searcy at Johnson’s Bait and Tackle in Yuba City reported an amazing striped bass bite on the Feather, stating, “The Feather dropped, and it will drop again to 3 or 4 thousand cfs. The striped bass have moved into the holes in the river, and with the water temperatures warming up, they are starting to spawn. If you want to get in on the hot bite, you have to come now. Drifting minnows, anchoring with anchovies and pile worms, tossing swimbaits, or trolling are all working. All of the launch ramps are open including Star Bend, Boyd’s Pump, Riverfront Marina, and Yuba City. The water on the Sacramento remains a bit high, but the Tisdale launch ramp may be open by next week.”

 


Feather River:
The striper bite has been phenomenal on the Feather over the past several days, but it slowed down on Thursday 4-27. The water releases jumped up from 36,000 to 41,000 cfs, and J. D. Richey of Richey’s Sport Fishing said,  “It has been an incredible bite, but about 11:00 on Thursday, the water turned dirty with trees floating downstream. We saw plenty of fish, but they didn’t bite as well as they have been. The stripers are not showing signs of spawning in the colder water as of yet. We will have to grind it out on Friday until the barometric pressure mellows out.” Richey is using both swimbaits and spoons for the linesides.
Scott Marran of Yuba City confirmed the slower action on Thursday after experiencing a tremendous bite earlier in the week at the mouth of the Yuba River. He said, “That bite dissolved as the fish are scattered out and moving upriver past the Trestle.” Marran added that two big fish were taken on Thursday despite the overall tough bite with one on the Yuba and the other upriver on the Feather.


A grand compromise for the Delta outlined
Sac Bee

Conflict over water allocations from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta is the most intractable water management problem in California.

The sources of contention are many, but three interrelated issues dominate the debate: whether to build two tunnels that divert water from the Sacramento River, how much water to allocate to endangered fish species, and what to do about the 1,100 miles of Delta levees that are essential to the local economy.
All of these issues need to be addressed to reduce unproductive conflict and litigation and resolve our water problems.
Here we outline a potential “grand compromise” for the Delta that meets the co-equal goals of water supply reliability and ecosystem health prescribed by the 2009 Delta Reform Act. To this end, California should:

▪  Build one tunnel, not two

The most commonly stated fear about the twin tunnels is that they will increase exports and significantly harm the Delta. Project proponents have failed to convince opponents that proposed regulatory assurances on the tunnels’ use will actually protect water quality and species that are at risk.

Building one tunnel with roughly half the proposed capacity caps the amount of water that can be taken from the Sacramento River and greatly reduces the project’s cost. Even at half of its proposed capacity, the project would significantly improve the reliability and quality of water supply. And by having two locations to draw water from the Delta – a new tunnel plus the existing south Delta pumps – the project creates the necessary flexibility to better manage the environmen

▪  Manage water for ecosystems, not just endangered species

To improve the effectiveness of environmental investments, California will need to move away from viewing water and land management activities in the Delta primarily through the lens of the Endangered Species Act. Instead, environmental managers should allocate water and restoration funds based on greatest overall ecological returns on investments.

This does not mean abandoning threatened or endangered species, but rather refocusing recovery efforts on ecological health, based on realistic assessments of the benefits of environmental water allocations.

For example, it may be time to consider captive breeding for Delta smelt – which are approaching extinction in the wild – with the goal of reintroducing them into restored habitats in the north Delta. Targeted investments in riparian and floodplain habitat in the north Delta and Sacramento River watershed – along with well-timed flows to support native species’ life cycles – are likely to provide the highest return on investment for salmon.

To accomplish this, the state Water Resources Control Board should revise its Bay-Delta Water Quality Plan to allocate a share of water that can be flexibly managed to meet biological and ecological objectives. This strategy has been successful in Victoria, Australia, and the water board has proposed a similar approach for managing water in the lower San Joaquin River basin.

We believe existing law can accommodate this change in environmental management. This approach also guarantees a substantial share of water for environmental uses and a more certain water supply for the 25 million people and 3 million acres of farmland that depend on the Delta for at least some of their supply.

▪  Make investments that benefit Delta residents

Most Delta counties have other water problems that can be resolved within a grand compromise. Strengthening the levees that protect Delta islands would reduce flood risk to farms, homes, roads, pipelines and power lines. It would also improve the reliability of export water supplies.

Negotiators should also explore opportunities for Delta residents to benefit from water quality improvements – for instance, by providing access to tunnel water in places where local supplies are salty. These improvements would recognize the Delta’s residents as essential partners in the administration of California’s largest and most important water system.

Grand compromises require sacrifice to achieve a better future. For those who rely on water exports from the Delta, a single tunnel would be a cost-effective means of improving supply reliability. For environmental interests, a flexibly managed, guaranteed block of environmental water would facilitate a more functional and sustainable estuary. And for Delta residents, the levee improvements would enhance the security of their lives and livelihoods.

Negotiation of this grand compromise will require stakeholders to embrace its broad contours before turning to its many details. If we fail again to find common ground, the political paralysis that has plagued the Delta for decades will continue. And the many economic and environmental benefits that the Delta provides to California will continue to decline.

----------------------------

Golden Gate Salmon Association Reacts to One Tunnel Proposal

San Francisco -- GGSA executive director John McManus reacted to the PPIC opinion piece in today’s Sacramento Bee calling for the replacement of the Delta twin tunnels proposal with construction of a single tunnel with the following statements.
“The biggest problem with the old twin tunnels proposal is that instead of developing a reasonable project that would provide salmon protections while allowing export of a scientifically justified amount of water, they designed a project far too big to pass the laugh test.
The existing system of moving water north to south across the Delta is a salmon killer which is why alternatives have been considered. A carefully planned alternative could provide a way to move some water while killing fewer salmon but this would require a project design that makes salmon protections a priority, not an afterthought.
GGSA welcomes a new approach, and we hope that this leads to a complete rethink of the current twin tunnels project. For too long, twin tunnel advocates have resisted new ideas.
Salmon fishermen and most reasonable Californians believe the only real way to safeguard against over diversion of our rivers is to limit the size of any water intakes and downstream plumbing that moves diverted water. A single tunnel proposal could be a step in that direction.”

Background:

There's no doubt that the existing method of diverting Central Valley river water to pumps in the south Delta pulls baby salmon off their natural migration route to their death. The status quo is a known salmon killer. Can we do better? Theoretically, yes. Was the gargantuan twin tunnels proposal a reasonable answer? Absolutely not.

As long as Sacramento River water is going to be diverted for export to the existing south Delta pumps, then some sort of new conveyance with intakes that can operate while still allowing baby salmon in the Sacramento River to safely pass could be an improvement with conditions. Conditions would include capping total Delta water exports at a volume pegged to the outcome of the State Water Resources Control Board Delta flows process. In addition part of the solution would include new facilities that would safely shield San Joaquin River salmon from being pulled to their death in the existing pumps. The current forebays that feed water to both the state and federal pumps are predator magnets and baby salmon killers and would need fixing. So too the Delta Cross Channel, a manmade canal feeding Sacramento River water, and baby salmon, to the pumps needs to be closed during key times of the year.

Central Valley salmon evolved to transit the Delta riding on east to west flows as Central Valley rivers emptied into the Delta and Bay. These flows pushed baby salmon from the Delta out to the bay and ocean. Since the massive state and federal water projects were built, these Delta flows have shifted more north to south as the Sacramento River is sucked off its natural course, largely through the Delta Cross Channel, to the pumps.

The biggest problem with the existing twin tunnels plans and design is that it calls for intakes, pipes and pumps big enough to drain the entire Sacramento River dry at most times of the year. This simply isn't credible to reasonable Californians or those charged with protecting fish and wildlife, which is why the twin tunnels are hopelessly bogged down.

The State Water Resources Control Board is currently in the process of determining how much water needs to be left in the rivers and allowed to flow through the Delta and Bay to keep the Delta, Bay, and our native fish and wildlife from dying. Only after these calculations are complete will we really know how much water in various types of precipitation years will be surplus and available for export. Most reasonable people would agree it makes more sense to design massive, expensive public works plumbing projects only after you know for sure how much water you’re likely to move. As is, the current huge version of the tunnels don’t pencil out for the water users who would have to pay for them unless water diversions are drastically increased, something most Californians don’t support.

Tunnel proponents argue that while massive, the volume of water they'd trap and export would be limited by controls on the intakes that can be opened or closed as needed. They ask the public to trust them to operate these responsibly. Salmon fishermen, for one, don't trust them because Central Valley water operations have been operated to the detriment of salmon over and over again.

Finally, the state and south of Delta water users must recognize that communities like Los Angeles, San Diego and Silicon Valley want to be less dependent on the Delta, not
more. They’re proving this by investing in recycling facilities, water conservation programs, cleaning up groundwater, capturing storm water, and other projects.

We hope this proposal from PPIC sparks some serious discussion within state government and those who would pay for a new water conveyance. There’s no doubt the current system of moving water is harmful to salmon.

The Golden Gate Salmon Association (www.goldengatesalmonassociation.org) is a coalition of salmon advocates that includes commercial and recreational salmon fisherman, businesses, restaurants, a native tribe, environmentalists, elected officials, families and communities that rely on salmon. GGSA’s mission is to protect and restore California’s largest salmon producing habitat comprised of the Central Valley river’s that feed the Bay-Delta ecosystem and the communities that rely on salmon as a long-term, sustainable, commercial, recreational and cultural resource.



Upcoming Events:

USAFishing proudly supports the many fishery and wildlife organizations that benefit anglers and hunters throughout Northern California. Does your organization have an upcoming event? Contact us at fishsite@aol.com and we will gladly post the information on our reports pages.

California Waterfowl Dinners and Youth Events Calendar

Golden Gate Salmon Association Events Calendar

Gun Owners of California Events and Dinners


River Levels:



 

 
Google
www usafishing

USAfishing.com Copyright © 2005 All rights reserved